Thankful.

•November 27, 2008 • 6 Comments

In these strange times, I know I should see the glass as half full instead of half empty. And Im trying. For instance, Im thankful that I have a roof over my head, a little plot of land that I call my own, my family (my children) is nearby, that is, all live fairly close, my car is fixed and is running decent, I have my health for the most part, and I have a pretty decent job (even if I DO have an assinine boss). Im able to pay my bills (mostly) and I am blessed with good friends. Ive reconnected with my roots (musically) and I have broadened my horizons.

I try to ignore the minor annoyances that crop up (my sink is clogged, one catbox is not enough for 4 cats, my boss is a micromanager,my best bud is consumed about his health and has forsaken me, and the love of my life is otherwise occupied). I do have recent concerns about arthritis, and perhaps memory loss, but that may be temporary or correctable. Yes, my neighbors are a pain, but one day I will have a fence. Yes the daily commute is a pain, but its only an hour or so out of my day.

To be sure, things could be a whole lot worse, for example, I could need dialysis, or kidney transplant, or something…John McCain could have won the election, I could have been laid off or been seriously injured. My children could live hours away. My true love or my best bud could be dead.

I know that some of my friends/acquaintances are experiencing difficult times, and I grieve for them. I pray that things settle themselves out soon for their sake. I cant help but come back to the fact that in spite of all the crappy stuff that is going on, things could be a whole lot crappier, and Im glad they’re not, at least in MY life.

Happy Turkey Day everyone, and I hope that you can ALL find SOMETHING to be thankful for…..

nuffsaidblack1

Pardon me!

•November 24, 2008 • 2 Comments

Welp, its the talk of the town, all the wrongdoers and miscreants that Bush is busily pardoning, almost as an afterthought, on his way out. His choices are baffling to say the least: A man convicted of wrongfully using an illegal pesticide that killed Bald and Golden eagles, another man who violated the law by bringing an environmentally protected animal into the US, the daughter of a Doctor who was found to be committing insurance fraud (she apparently aided and abetted and withheld evidence), a military officer convicted of selling drugs, a man who unlawfully obtained foodstamps…Is it just me or is anyone else scratching their head over these choices?

And then you have all the folks who were convicted of creative accounting, of bilking the taxpayers of the state of CA during the last years of Gray Davis, the friendly folks at Enron, and other “take the $$ and run” companies who are no doubt hastily putting forth their petitions for pardon. The former Governor of Lousiana and a representative from CA are already clamoring for shorter sentences, and I have no doubt Bush will pardon them. He’s gleefully ignored his oath of office, his duty to this country, his obligation to the rest of the world, and every other obligation the office of President represents.

The sad fact is, his pardons are immutable. Once given they cannot be undone. That means, anyone who might have been brought up on charges stemming from conduct under Bush’s watch will get a free pass. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzalez, Libby, and Rove come to mind right off the bat. Anyone who’s ever done the bidding of this EVIL administration….yep, get out of jail free. The unmitigated GALL of this man, this administration, is just head shakingly astounding.

How I WISH the foot-dragging Dem Congress would forestall any further attempts by Bush and Co to circumvent justice and IMMEDIATELY empanel a Grand Jury or whatever to investigate war crimes BEFORE Bush pardons any more wrongdoers. I swear, I dont know who I am madder at: Bush and his obvious slimy antics or the Dems for not growing a backbone and STOPPING him from doing any more harm…..

*must grit teeth and hold on until January 20th*

nuffsaidblack1

Plusses and Minuses

•November 20, 2008 • 2 Comments

That dont look right does it? Well, the spell check thingie liked it so I guess it must be marginally ok…

ANYWAY. In my life Ive noticed lately that I can put everything into one of two columns: Plus or Minus.

for example: Plus= KISS, Paul Stanley, the Tick, iMac computers, democratic wins in November (and beyond), family, my cats are IN, MST3K, Monty Python (16 ton boxed set), my son is minding me more…my car seems to be finally fixed (after $1200 worth of repairs)

in the MINUS column, I’d have to say: I hate my job, I hate the way my Supervisor supervises me…I DESPISE my neighbors, I miss the Irishman, I wish I were 25 again……and Pendel was right about certain needs. Damn him anyway.

So NOW WHAT???

nuffsaidblack1

Alan Keyes brings suit against Obama, CA Secretary of State et al

•November 17, 2008 • 10 Comments

CHANGING OF THE GUARD
‘Constitutional crisis’ looming over Obama’s birth location
Alan Keyes lawsuit warns America may see ‘usurper’ in Oval Office

The California Secretary of State should refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Keyes and others.

The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen,” a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth, but his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born, while a video posted on YouTube features Obama’s Kenyan grandmother Sarah claiming to have witnessed Obama’s birth in Kenya.

The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Alan Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

The petition is a request for the Superior Court of California in Sacramento County to issue a peremptory writ barring Secretary of State Debra Bowen “from both certifying to the governor the names of the California Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until such documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain.”

It continues with a request for a writ barring California’s electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentary proof is produced.

An Obama spokesperson interviewed by WND described such lawsuits as “garbage.”

The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote, when it is held in December, by a 2-to-1 margin.

Named as defendants in the action are Bowen, Obama, vice president elect Joe Biden and the long list of California party electors.

Citing the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born” citizen, the case discusses other state and federal court cases regarding “aspects of lost or dual citizenship concerning Senator Obama. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners’ argument that reasonable doubt exists as to the eligibility of the Democratic Party’s nominee for President,” the case said.

“There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

“Since [the Secretary of State] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States of America is received by her,” the document said.

“This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

“To this date, in this regard, SOS has not carried out that fundamental duty.”

The case said a simple attestation from the candidate or his party isn’t sufficient.

“Historically, California Secretaries of State have exercised their due diligence by reviewing necessary background documents, verifying that the candidates that were submitted by the respective political parties as eligible for the ballot were indeed eligible. In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for President of the United States. The then SOS, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver’s birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for President. Using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party candidate Larry Holmes was removed from the ballot.

The “certificate of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.

“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama’s time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama’s mother having given up his U.S. citizenship.

Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be “naturalized,” not “natural-born.”

“Based on all of the above, it is the duty of the SOS to obtain proper documentation of Senator Obama’s citizenship to confirm his eligibility for the office or the President of the United States,” the case said.

Just this week, WND has reported on more than half a dozen other legal challenges have been filed in federal and state courts demanding Obama’s decertification from ballots or seeking to halt elector meetings, claiming he has failed to prove his U.S. citizenship status.

Among the states where cases are being tracked are Ohio, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Hawaii, and there were reports of other cases being developed in Utah, Wyoming, Florida, New York, North Carolina, Texas, California and Virginia.

*******************************************************************

Obviously, this issue is far from over, the sour grapes bunch are busily chewing away on this particular bone. As I stated in previous posts, Obama is doing more harm than good by ducking this issue and hoping it goes away. Either he has something to hide or…I dont know what…all I know is, the longer people can bring suit and point fingers, the worse it looks for him. I would have hoped he could have silenced them by now, they obviously arent going to go away. This is actually beginning to worry me a bit, because it has gone now from Phil Berg to numerous suits in several states! If there wasnt some kernel of truth to the allegations, these suits would be dismissed as frivolous Im sure. The fact that they are not, and are actually multiplying, is cause for alarm I think….disgruntled conservatives everywhere are positively salivating at the prospect of Obama being disqualified, and I really wish he would hurry up and prove his legitimacy!!

By the way, Pendel, your earlier comment holding ME personally responsible was both ridiculous and off base. You’re the type of personality apparently that decides to shoot the messenger when you dont like the message. Far better you take your poison pen and lambaste those that ARE effectuating this effort.

nuffsaidblack1

The sky is falling…

•November 16, 2008 • 1 Comment

This actually happened Saturday night, but I’m writing it early Sunday morning just to get it down and see if any news stories pop up…

Last night (11/15/08) I went outside to see if my solar driveway lights (you know, the ornamental ones that line your driveway or walkway) were working. Sadly, they were not. I dont know why, but I happened to look up at the sky and I was marveling at how bright the stars were and how pretty the night sky looked when suddenly, almost directly above, I saw a flaming trail appear, an object left a bright orange streak in the sky—similar to a falling star, but much closer. I watched for a few seconds until it disappeared, and I waited for a boom, or an explosion or something, but nothing ever came. I dont know what I saw, but it definitely had a bright “head” on it, and a very long streak “tail”. it was bright, light orange (“flame colored”)

I dont know what I saw, but I dont remember reading about any space debris supposed to be falling, and if it was a plane going down, why didnt I hear a boom? I dont know, it was very freaky, and I dont like being freaked out. I hope it wasnt a plane, I’d hate to think I witnessed a death 😦  Also, I guess I should mention that I live in the mountains on the Eastern side of CA, approximately even with Reno, NV.  I only add that to give a frame of reference since I may not have been the only one to witness the streak….

UPDATE: As it happens, I saw that folks in Canada saw something that was amazingly similar to what I saw…. here is a LINK to a video of the meteor the Canadians saw…

nuffsaidblack1

Alliteration. Always an Adventure!

•November 14, 2008 • 5 Comments

Alright, Ive been having fun with alliteration in my comments, but Ive decided to bring it out in the open and challenge all comers to an Alliteration Game:

Try to construct a sentence where the first letter of EVERY word is the same. No filler words, and they must marginally make sense. I’ll start with some I just came up with in the shower (hey! some of my best work is done while showering!) Also, try to have more than 3 words if possible, its more impressive that way 😛

Inebriated imbeciles investigating icebox immediately imploded.

Forbidden Fruits foster furtiveness.

Please place package properly.

Four friends found furry fox frolicking

Clattering, crowded cable car coming!

Detecting disturbance, Dave detained drunks.

Smelly skunk sprayed sporadically.

Queen quietly quit quilting.

Coveted comfy chair creates calm corner

Gorgeous guy got giggling girl great gift!

Betty brightly brought Bagels back before breakfast

HELP! Hairy hand held Henrietta hostage!

DAMMIT! Dynamite didn’t detonate!

a co-worker mentioned one that was similar to this:

proper preparation precludes piss-poor performance

EDIT: I had to add this to the front page, Im rather proud of it:

Sometimes some silly simpletons seem suspiciously supercilious: suggesting stupid steamy sagas substitute substance, severing seriousness; such sad simpering strained superfluous strivings simply stir sympathy—so sorry.

Alright, your turn!

nuffsaidblack1

Cats. Again.

•November 11, 2008 • 24 Comments

My favorite 4-legged beasties in a vertical slideshow of feline goodness. To start,

a cat for Pendel:

in-hell-cat

next up, a cat for Moose:

moosecat

another cat for moose:

cheeeeesecat

one for Carrots:

tl-dr

and for BATMAN:

batcat1

or this one:

batcat

for the Celery (and maybe Moose):

pwn-noobscat1

or maybe this for Celery:

pokemanscat2

for my friend Linds–some kitteh loves:

lovecat

for me:

guinness-cat

there will be Moar. srsly. And if you want a Cat, just ask.

nuffsaidblack1

voter-approved Gay marriage ban in CA could be overturned

•November 11, 2008 • 2 Comments

I hope this has legs:

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) – More than one-third of California‘s lawmakers are adding their voices to the chorus calling on the state’s highest court to overturn the prohibition on same-sex marriage approved by voters last week.

Forty-four members of the California Legislature filed a friend-of-the-court brief Monday in support of a lawsuit seeking to invalidate Proposition 8 on the grounds that voters did not have the authority to make such a dramatic change in state law.

The brief argues that the gay marriage ban improperly usurped the state Supreme Court’s duty to protect minority groups from discrimination. Proposition 8 overturned the court’s May decision that legalized same-sex marriage.

Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass are among the signers.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

****************************************************************************

Im a firm believer in separation of Church and State. The fundamentalists behind this discriminatory law need to be shown once and for all that the only morality they are responsible for is their OWN. And NO, Im not gay but I support their right to do as they wish in their own lives. Just like I believe in Religious freedom and freedom of choice for women regarding reproduction etc. As I said, I hope this effort has legs.

nuffsaidblack1


Fed wont ID recipients of $2 TRILLION(!!) in bailout monies

•November 11, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Oh the humanity:

Fed Defies Transparency Aim in Refusal to Disclose (Update2)

By Mark Pittman, Bob Ivry and Alison Fitzgerald

Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve is refusing to identify the recipients of almost $2 trillion of emergency loans from American taxpayers or the troubled assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would comply with congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system. Two months later, as the Fed lends far more than that in separate rescue programs that didn’t require approval by Congress, Americans have no idea where their money is going or what securities the banks are pledging in return.

“The collateral is not being adequately disclosed, and that’s a big problem,” said Dan Fuss, vice chairman of Boston- based Loomis Sayles & Co., where he co-manages $17 billion in bonds. “In a liquid market, this wouldn’t matter, but we’re not. The market is very nervous and very thin.”

Bloomberg News has requested details of the Fed lending under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure.

The Fed made the loans under terms of 11 programs, eight of them created in the past 15 months, in the midst of the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

“It’s your money; it’s not the Fed’s money,” said billionaire Ted Forstmann, senior partner of Forstmann Little & Co. in New York. “Of course there should be transparency.”

Treasury, Fed, Obama

Federal Reserve spokeswoman Michelle Smith declined to comment on the loans or the Bloomberg lawsuit. Treasury spokeswoman Michele Davis didn’t respond to a phone call and an e-mail seeking comment.

President-elect Barack Obama‘s economic adviser, Jason Furman, also didn’t respond to an e-mail and a phone call seeking comment from Obama. In a Sept. 22 campaign speech, Obama promised to “make our government open and transparent so that anyone can ensure that our business is the people’s business.”

The Fed’s lending is significant because the central bank has stepped into a rescue role that was also the purpose of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, bailout plan — without safeguards put into the TARP legislation by Congress.

Total Fed lending topped $2 trillion for the first time last week and has risen by 140 percent, or $1.172 trillion, in the seven weeks since Fed governors relaxed the collateral standards on Sept. 14. The difference includes a $788 billion increase in loans to banks through the Fed and $474 billion in other lending, mostly through the central bank’s purchase of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds.

Sept. 14 Decision

Before Sept. 14, the Fed accepted mostly top-rated government and asset-backed securities as collateral. After that date, the central bank widened standards to accept other kinds of securities, some with lower ratings. The Fed collects interest on all its loans.

The plan to purchase distressed securities through TARP called for buying at the “lowest price that the secretary (of the Treasury) determines to be consistent with the purposes of this Act,” according to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the law that covers TARP.

The legislation didn’t require any specific method for the purchases beyond saying mechanisms such as auctions or reverse auctions should be used “when appropriate.” In a reverse auction, bidders offer to sell securities at successively lower prices, helping to ensure that the Fed would pay less. The measure also included a five-member oversight board that includes Paulson and Bernanke.

At a Sept. 23 Senate Banking Committee hearing in Washington, Paulson called for transparency in the purchase of distressed assets under the TARP program.

`We Need Transparency’

“We need oversight,” Paulson told lawmakers. “We need protection. We need transparency. I want it. We all want it.”

At a joint House-Senate hearing the next day, Bernanke also stressed the importance of openness in the program. “Transparency is a big issue,” he said.

The Fed lent cash and government bonds to banks, which gave the Fed collateral in the form of equities and debt, including subprime and structured securities such as collateralized debt obligations, according to the Fed Web site. The borrowers have included the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks oppose any release of information because it might signal weakness and spur short-selling or a run by depositors, said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs for the Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington trade group.

Frank Backs Fed

“You have to balance the need for transparency with protecting the public interest,” Talbott said. “Taxpayers have a right to know where their tax dollars are going, but one piece of information standing alone could undermine public confidence in the system.”

The nation’s biggest banks, Citigroup, Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, declined to comment on whether they have borrowed money from the Fed. They received $120 billion in capital from the TARP, which was signed into law Oct. 3.

In an interview Nov. 6, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said the Fed’s disclosure is sufficient and that the risk the central bank is taking on is appropriate in the current economic climate. Frank said he has discussed the program with Timothy F. Geithner, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a possible candidate to succeed Paulson as Treasury secretary.

“I talk to Geithner and he was pretty sure that they’re OK,” said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. “If the risk is that the Fed takes a little bit of a haircut, well that’s regrettable.” Such losses would be acceptable, he said, if the program helps revive the economy.

`Unclog the Market’

Frank said the Fed shouldn’t reveal the assets it holds or how it values them because of “delicacy with respect to pricing.” He said such disclosure would “give people clues to what your pricing is and what they might be able to sell us and what your estimates are.” He wouldn’t say why he thought that information would be problematic.

Revealing how the Fed values collateral could help thaw frozen credit markets, said Ron D’Vari, chief executive officer of NewOak Capital LLC in New York and the former head of structured finance at BlackRock Inc.

“I’d love to hear the methodology, how the Fed priced the assets,” D’Vari said. “That would unclog the market very quickly.”

TARP’s $700 billion so far is being used to buy preferred shares in banks to shore up their capital. The program was originally intended to hold banks’ troubled assets while markets were frozen.

AIG Lending

The Bloomberg lawsuit argues that the collateral lists “are central to understanding and assessing the government’s response to the most cataclysmic financial crisis in America since the Great Depression.”

The Fed has lent at least $81 billion to American International Group Inc., the world’s largest insurer, so that it can pay obligations to banks. AIG today said it received an expanded government rescue package valued at more than $150 billion.

The central bank is also responsible for losses on a $26.8 billion portfolio guaranteed after Bear Stearns Cos. was bought by JPMorgan.

“As a taxpayer, it is absolutely important that we know how they’re lending money and who they’re lending it to,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Arlington, Virginia- based Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Ratings Cuts

Ultimately, the Fed will have to remove some securities held as collateral from some programs because the central bank’s rules call for instruments rated below investment grade to be taken back by the borrower and marked down in value. Losses on those assets could then be written off, partly through the capital recently injected into those banks by the Treasury.

Moody’s Investors Service alone has cut its ratings on 926 mortgage-backed securities worth $42 billion to junk from investment grade since Sept. 14, making them ineligible for collateral on some Fed loans.

The Fed’s collateral “absolutely should be made public,” said Mark Cuban, an activist investor, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks professional basketball team and the creator of the Web site BailoutSleuth.com, which focuses on the secrecy shrouding the Fed’s moves.

The Bloomberg lawsuit is Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at mpittman@bloomberg.net; Bob Ivry in New York at bivry@bloomberg.net; Alison Fitzgerald in Washington at afitzgerald2@bloomberg.net

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((color me surprised))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

nuffsaidblack1

Obama birth cert saga continues, Obama must reply by 12/1

•November 11, 2008 • 6 Comments

John P. Connolly | The Philadelphia Evening Bulletin | 11/09/2008

Philip J. Berg, [the attorney who filed suit against Mr. Obama challenging him to produce his original birth certificate to prove he meets the constitutional requirements to serve as U.S. president] filed a Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court late in October, in an effort to force Mr. Obama to produce the document.

Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that Mr. Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants are to respond to the writ, on or before Dec. 1.

The judge in Mr. Berg’s original case ruled that Mr. Berg does not have standing to enforce the constitutional requirements on a presidential candidate. Mr. Berg appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court.

“I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Mr. Obama put an electronic photo of a birth certification on his “Fight the Smears” Web site, a document that his critics have found unconvincing. The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan. The Obama campaign was unwilling to release the original document to the court when Mr. Berg filed suit in August, choosing instead to argue against Mr. Berg’s standing.

Complete article at theBulletin.us

fyi everybody….

I myself have mixed feelings about the outcome of this now that Obama has won. For the life of me, I cant understand why he would hesitate, you’d think it’d be the easiest thing in the world to produce your birth certificate. A notarized, raised seal copy. I have one, and I suspect most people do. On the other hand, if it turns out to be forged or tampered with, our country is going to erupt into chaos. Well, certain segments anyway….Im a firm believer that only a person legally entitled to BE the President should BE the President however, and if his birth cert is a forgery, then we go straight to Biden. (who I hope picks Hillary as his VP)

Of course, thats all pie in the sky speculation and very very premature at this point. Really, it would be best if Obama produced the real deal, and it showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that he’s legit.

nuffsaidblack1